Flex 4 and FlashBuilder 4 Released

Start your engines...

You can get the scoop here:


Spring and BlazeDS Best Practices

I recently wrote a white paper for a client to assist them in ramping up with Spring and BlazeDS Integration (SBI) best practices. The link below will allow you to download the white paper.

It contains many links to helpful downloads and assists in a "painless" install and configuration for this solution set. There is also a java and flex example app to get you started. Enjoy...

BlazeDS Best Practices

Flash Camp Atlanta

If you are looking for a great day of Flex and Adobe discussion/training sign up for Flash Camp Atlanta!

It's on Aug. 28th and starts at 8 for the special introduction course with general sessions starting at 9. You can't beat the training you will receive from these experts in Flash and RIA; plus it only costs 50 bucks!

I am planning to attend, hope to see you there; click on the image to register:

jvm.config Tuning Tip For All Server Side Java Solutions

I have been wanting to blog about an experience I had not too long ago on a project where the jvm was consistently throwing OOM errors. It had me banging my head against my desk for a few days attempting to trace where the culprit was.

Was it code related?... yes, was it bad code?... sort of, was it very very very intense code (looping over many sql calls and instantiating many objects)?... YES! The challenge here was to apply a quick band aid rather than redesign this rules engine that had the characteristics listed due to time constraints. It is important to note I was not responsible for the poorly written code 8-).

I had to first identify if there were memory leaks due to this code. To do this I utilized YourKit Java Profiler. They have .NET and Java profilers that allow you to monitor their respective runtimes. YourKit Profiler is very simple to configure within the jvm.config file (I'm not going to get into that in this blog). My point here is that I witnessed memory steadily climb and at times spike, but was only able to reclaim memory when executing a manual GC. UGGG!!! So, no memory leak, but the runtime was hanging on to what it had... Why was the GC not reclaiming memory quickly on it's own? I had all the BP jvm args of old, etc., etc. ParNewGC and RMI to no avail.

And to get back to the initial issue; the blasted OOM error. I searched high and low and identified a thread on a Sun forum that there were issues with jre 1.5 that ultimately threw a OOM error if the runtime was unable to reclaim memory during a GC within a given time frame. The workaround for this was to set a time constraint in the JVM (which didn't work) or install 1.6_10 or later. This was my first step. I installed this JRE version and pointed my jvm.config to it. The application ran fine under this JRE except that I was still seeing the memory creep to the ceiling with no reclaim.

I then read on one of Sun's GC tuning white papers the following paragraph:

The -XX:+AggressiveHeap option inspects the machine resources (size of memory and number of processors) and attempts to set various parameters to be optimal for long-running, memory allocation-intensive jobs. It was originally intended for machines with large amounts of memory and a large number of CPUs, but in the J2SE platform, version 1.4.1 and later it has shown itself to be useful even on four processor machines. With this option the throughput collector (-XX:+UseParallelGC) is used along with adaptive sizing (-XX:+UseAdaptiveSizePolicy). The physical memory on the machines must be at least 256MB before AggressiveHeap can be used. The size of the initial heap is calculated based on the size of the physical memory and attempts to make maximal use of the physical memory for the heap (i.e., the algorithms attempt to use heaps nearly as large as the total physical memory).

Note: -XX:+UseAdaptiveSizePolicy is on by default so I don't explicitly define it in my args.

Amazingly, once I added this to the args, removed ParNewGC (enabled UseParallelGC) the server ran flawlessly for days and days without a restart. I was serving requests into the millions without a restart!!! A partial arg list specific to these setting are below, please let me know your thoughts and concerns as I always enjoy constructive feedback.

java.args=-server -Xmx1024m -Xms1024m -XX:+AggressiveHeap -XX:+UseParallelGC -Dsun.io.useCanonCaches=false -XX:MaxPermSize=512m

Note: This was for a ColdFusion 8 instance.

Flash 9 and 10 Compatibility Matrix

I was recently tasked on my current project to generate this. I hope it helps some of you in communication regarding Flash support across multiple OS and Browsers.


Writing for ColdFusion 9

I just got word that I will be contributing to the books supporting the ColdFusion 9 release.

Adobe is making significant improvements as they continue to evolve the product.

I am stoked to be involved for a third release and look forward to working with a stellar team of authors.

Flex Camp Miami

I wanted to blog a reminder that I am promoting Flex Camp Miami (http://www.flexcampmiami.com). It will be on the University of Miami campus. A great place to meet during the winter season and registration is only $30!!!!

The testimonials alone are reason to attend: http://www.flexcampmiami.com/page.cfm/testimonials.

It's an opportunity to learn from the industry's finest, network, discuss the daily grind, etc. I look forward to seeing you there!

Here is the Agenda:

Time Session and Speaker
8:00-8:30 am Registration
8:30-9:30 am Welcome and Keynote (Flex 4 Preview)
Brian Rinaldi, Universal Mind
Greg Wilson, Adobe

9:30-10:20 am Working With Data in AIR
David Tucker, Universal Mind
10:20-10:40 am Break
10:40-11:30 amIn Search of AOP for AS3
Maxim Porges, Highwinds
11:30-12:20 pm Merapi or How to Blow Your Mind with AIR
Andrew Powell, Universal Mind
12:20-1:00 pm Lunch (provided)
1:00-1:50 pm User Experience Design Topic TBA
1:50-2:40 pm Continuous Integration and Flex
Brian LeGros, Highwinds
2:40-3:00 pmBreak
3:00-3:50 pm ScrapBlog.com Speaker
3:50-4:40 pm
Mate Framework
Laura Arguello, ASFusion
4:40-5:00 pm Closing and Door Prizes

So as you can see, something for everyone. Look forward to seeing you there.

ColdFusion createObject "Component" and Pathing Performance

I haven't blogged in awhile due to schedule, but had to blog this experience I recently had while attempting to stabilize an application and enhance performance.

I have always taken for granted that createObject was lightning fast... Well, as fast as feasibly possibly under a given JVM.

I think I was dead wrong and this may be an issue for Adobe to address. I am unclear on the internals of course. But I have been up against OOMs on my current project and wanted to test out using soft reference (cached objects) and use duplicate from the cache rather than createObject.

Far stretch I know... but hey it was worth a try. What was revealed was that performance was negligible and createObject was faster in some intervals. Memory behaved the same, no real bonus. So in discussion with a fellow consultant I told him I'd ship a zip to him for test purposes as he had said he'd seen a significant performance enhancement with duplicate (not true by the way).

What happened next totally shocked me. To simplify the test code I snagged my VO.cfc out of it's proper place (several dirs down i.e. sitedir, com, bus, app, model, vo.. you get the idea) and put it in the root of the calling cfm. I then removed all the pathing (dot notation) from my createObject call and executed the cfm to see if it would run ok after the change.

The test was a loop of 10k over this create object call. I was seeing execution times of around 30 seconds. When I ran the updated code it went to 577 milliseconds... I am still befuddled by this. Is there that much overhead with pathing?

I initially thought it was a mapping issue because I had been using mappings, but absolute path from root was just as slow.

Please Adobe tell me this is Sun's jvm and not your code. I know this is negligible with 100 or so creates, but imagine the boost if I did find something here.

For clarification I am running on a Mac (OS X, CF running in JBOSS), but also tested on my old Dell (XP, CF running in JRUN). I didn't see as dramatic a difference on WIntel, but my exec time went from 30 seconds to 4 seconds. I am happy with 10x faster on Windows too...

Any insight here is greatly appreciated. Example Code:

      currentTime = now();
    rqaArray = arrayNew(1);
    initTime = getTickCount();
         for (index=1; index lte 10000; index = index + 1)
    // pathing example replace vo reference with     //this pathing call com.mercer.mercerOnline.model.RQASummaryVO
    rqa = createObject("component","RQASummaryVO");
    rqa.rqaID = index;
            rqa.type = "theType";
            rqa.createDate = currentTime;
            rqa.submitDate = currentTime;
            rqa.client = "currentClient";
            rqa.clientID = "clientID";
            rqa.status = 6;
            rqa.userID = 123456;
            rqa.agencyID = "agencyID";
            rqa.predecessorID = 0;
            rqa.locked = false;
            rqa.deleted = false;
            rqa.title = "The Title "&#index#;
            rqa.policyNumber = "thePolicyNum";
            rqa.agencyName = "agencyName";
            rqa.totalPremium = "totalPremium";
            rqa.hasMessages = false;
            rqa.isAssigned = false;
            rqa.assignedTo = "";
            rqa.proposedEffDate = currentTime;
    rqa.proposedExpDate = currentTime;
    rqa.agentName                     = "agentName";

         endTime = getTickCount();

         totalTime = endTime - initTime;
<cfdump var="#arrayLen(rqaArray)#">
<cfdump var="#rqaArray[10000]#" />
<cfdump var="#totalTime#" />

Spatial Key (The Future of GIS)

I finally found some time to blog on what I deem a revolutionary software solution released by Universal Mind. Having my head in GIS solutions; ESRI, MapQuest and the players they integrate with I state knowing full well based on what I have seen over this 7 year period that the approach taken to this solution goes far beyond any solution on the market and will provide tremendous benefits to any organization that retains and/or analyzes location based data.

You may be asking yourself, what is the benefit of Spatial Key with regard to the data in question? The quick response is that if you are dealing with large datasets spread globally, regionally, or even locally this software will save you time. Please follow the Law Enforcement link to see how Spatial Key is currently being utilized by the Ogden Police Department.

Imagine millions of data points immediately organized allowing the user to drill down, expedite reporting, and understand relationships of data that may not have been realized prior to using Spatial Key. This last item is important with regard to statistics associated with location data spread over time. A real world scenario would be an event that created increases and or decreases of a given activity in certain locations (i.e sales, travel, instability, etc). With Spatial Key the timeframe of this event can be filtered graphically in which the analytics behind this filter can be readily deduced. See the demo here and try out the various example applications here

As human beings we are visual creatures and when it comes to crunching numbers or aligning information what better approach is there than to understand where the data points are generated from and then drill into this data with a better understanding of what is occurring. I have just touched on the surface at this point with regard to data integration with Spatial Key.

In closing I have to comment on the incredibly intuitive visual cues built into viewing the data across a map backdrop. These are features such as heat maps, heat grids, and graduated circles which will show you hot and cold spots within your data points. There is also timeline playback support where animation of data across time will show how data changed within a given time period.

I look forward to your comments and questions regarding Spatial Key.

Quick Blog (Use mx:Form)

I have been too busy to blog over the past couple months and this is more of a note than a blog entry. I have come across a few applications in the past 6 months that had your standard CRUD forms.

The problem is that most of them used HBOX and VBOX in attempt to align Labels and TextInput items. ACKKK! These can significantly increase the size of your swf after compile in Flex Builder. For form layout you can almost always use mx:Form. The feature set behind this tag is very intuitive as well.

I've seen developers write code to handle key press of the enter key in an effort to trigger the firing of a default button on the form. This is incorporated in the mx:Form tag also; you just point to the button via the defaultButton property. The default button will fire when you click enter key on text input items.

I have attached a simple example of mx:Form with a default button displaying an alert. Hope this helps and check out the language reference for more info as I didn't touch on all features: mx:Form

Sample App:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute" viewSourceURL="srcview/index.html">
         import mx.controls.Alert;
         private function showAlert(event:MouseEvent):void
            Alert.show('You submitted the form dude. ' + 'Form Data: ' + formField.text );
   <mx:Form x="0" y="0" width="447" height="488" defaultButton="{submitButton}">            

         <mx:Label id="exampleForm" text="Example Form" />
         <mx:FormItem id="lblFormField" label="Form Field:">
            <mx:TextInput id="formField" enabled="true" cornerRadius="4" text="Default text." toolTip="Enter some text."/>
         <mx:FormItem width="409" height="25">
            <mx:Button id="submitButton" label="Submit" click="showAlert(event)"/>   


More Entries

Copyright Strikefish, Inc., 2005. All rights reserved.